For at least the short term, stocks have again dodged an expected and overdue correction. Last week I wrote that the S&P 500 was falling toward its 50-day moving average and that a break below that mark could trigger a more serious correction. Instead, the index bounced off its 50-day MA and began moving higher. That type of market behavior is typically associated with strong bull market trends.
Anyone looking at a price chart of major market indices over the past six months would conclude that stocks are in a very powerful uptrend. On the other hand, if one were forced to make an assessment of the markets based solely on fundamental data the determination would undoubtedly be much different. In spite of the surge in stocks, the economy continues to face drastic challenges that will take years to resolve.
Many traders and investors seem to be ignoring long-term economic realities in an attempt to capture short-term gains. But that is a high-risk game that could end disastrously for those who are participating.
Stock market advances are ultimately based on corporate profits. Investors are rewarded when corporations are making money. When a corporation has no profits there is no financial reason to own its stock unless an investor believes it will have future profits. Investment based on hope rather than on economic fundamentals is called “speculation.” Speculation can drive an investment higher for a time (creating an economic bubble), but without sufficient profits the investment will eventually collapse.
In the United States, corporate profits are primarily driven by consumer spending, which normally accounts for about two-thirds of the nation’s economic activity. For the first three quarters of this year, corporate earnings have been dismal in part because consumers are paying off debt and saving money rather than spending. The Federal Reserve reported this week that total outstanding consumer debt fell by $12 billion in August, a 5.8 percent annual rate of decline. The July rate was revised to show a decline of $19 billion, or 9.1 percent. Does anyone else find it ironic that the response of individuals to this economic situation is exactly the opposite of the increased spending and debt espoused by the government?
In addition, a rising unemployment rate and cutbacks in worker hours means that consumers have less money to spend. According to the most recent employment summary from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, since the start of the recession in December 2007, “the number of unemployed persons has increased by 7.6 million to 15.1 million, and the unemployment rate has doubled to 9.8 percent.”
This number does not include 5.4 million long-term unemployed workers who have been without jobs for more than 27 weeks. It does not include 9.2 million involuntary part-time workers. It does not include 2.2 million people who “were not counted as unemployed because they had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey.” When added together, the true unemployment rate approaches 20%.
That’s one-fifth of the labor force that cannot be counted on to increase spending anytime soon. That becomes especially significant as the Christmas shopping season approaches. For many retailers, holiday shopping is the difference between success and failure. Weak Christmas spending could easily be a catalyst for a major downturn in stock prices.
Several weeks ago I wrote about how earnings among the companies that make up the S&P 500 index have declined more than 95% since peaking in 2007. This resulted in a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E ratio) of 140.76 for the second quarter of 2009, according to Standard & Poors. For comparison, that is more than three times higher than the previous highest quarterly P/E ratio for the index. This record high level occurred in spite of the fact that most of the companies included in the index met or exceeded earnings expectations for the quarter.
A recent article in ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter commented on the current extreme valuation of the S&P 500 index. It noted: “Historically, a P/E ratio north of 20 is viewed as expensive. Historically, there is almost a 70% chance of correction after P/E levels spike above 25-30. Imagine the impact of a 140 P/E ratio.”
Corporations are just beginning the reporting season for third quarter earnings. No doubt most will again report that earnings will meet or beat expectations. But that is primarily because expectations have been dramatically lowered. For example, Dow component Alcoa this week announced that its third quarter earnings topped expectations. But even though its reported profit of 4 cents per share was better than the forecasted 9 cent loss, it was still significantly lower than the 37 cents a share profit from the same period in 2008. Overall third quarter revenue was down 34% for the quarter. Most individuals, households, or small businesses that suffered a 34% drop in revenue would be forced to make significant budget cutbacks. Yet the financial media is hailing these numbers as evidence that the recession is near an end.
Many readers might be wondering why stocks prices are rising if the economy remains in such dire straights.
One significant reason is that there is no where else for some money to go. Let me cite a specific personal example. My wife is a public school teacher. As a government employee her pension is invested in the markets. Although she has a claim to a share of that money after retirement, she currently has no say in how it is invested. Nationwide, billions of dollars is automatically funneled into 401Ks, pensions, or other retirement plans on an ongoing basis. Virtually all of it is invested into the financial markets regardless of how the markets are performing at any given moment.
The recession and its accompanying economic troubles have eliminated many investment options. Numerous hedge funds have failed or voluntarily shut down. Real estate development has dramatically slowed. Some have postponed starting new businesses until the economy improves. For many investors, putting their money into the stock market is the best remaining alternative.
Virtually everyone is aware that the government has injected trillions of dollars into the economy in an effort to end the recession. Indirectly, some of that money makes its way back into the financial markets. Some is invested by banks and financial institutions. Some comes from the pension funds of companies working on projects funded by stimulus cash.
Finally, when stock prices plunged in 2008, many investors and traders pulled money out of the markets and have remained on the sidelines ever since. As these investors watch the markets continue to rise, many choose to jump back into the markets because they do not want to miss out if the market rally continues.
All this means that in spite of the recession, there is a large pool of money available to be invested into stocks. And as long as there are available buyers, stock prices will continue to climb.
For advisors like Strategis Financial Group and for many individual investors, the rising markets create powerful emotional pressure to jump back into the stock market. But to do so would be irresponsible when fundamental and technical indicators continue to show that the risk of a major correction remains very high.
F.S.