<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dental Dollars</title>
	<link>http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter</link>
	<description>Your Market Advisor</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The missing economic recovery</title>
		<link>http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/07/29/466/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/07/29/466/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dental Dollars Advisors</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Newsletter</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/07/29/466/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week produced several disappointing economic reports prompting some analysts and economists to mention the possibility of a double dip recession. My response to that assessment is: When was the recovery that marked the end of the first portion of the recession? After all, The National Bureau of Economic Research—the official arbiter of economic cycles—has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week produced several disappointing economic reports prompting some analysts and economists to mention the possibility of a double dip recession. My response to that assessment is: When was the recovery that marked the end of the first portion of the recession? After all, The National Bureau of Economic Research—the official arbiter of economic cycles—has yet to declare an end to what many economists now refer to as the Great Recession.</p>
<p>It is fairly simple to put together a list of economic fundamentals that give evidence of a continuing weak economy. It is more difficult to compile a list that provides signs of economic strengthening. Below is some of the data from this week that shows continuing economic malaise.</p>
<p>Consumer confidence: Tuesday the Conference Board reported that consumer confidence continued to slip in July after a steep decline in June. The Consumer Confidence Index stands at 50.4, down from 54.3 in June. The monthly survey showed that consumers are more pessimistic about future job prospects. The report also showed that the number of consumers expecting an improvement in business conditions dropped to 15.9% in July, compared to 17.1% in June.</p>
<p>Durable goods orders: Wednesday a Commerce Department report showed that orders for durable goods fell 1.0%, the second month in a row with a decline. The May number was revised downward to a 0.8% decline rather than the 0.6% drop originally reported.</p>
<p>Employment: The Labor Department says the unemployment rate rose in 291 of 374 areas in June from May. It fell in 55 areas and was flat in 28. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the June U6 unemployment rate was 16.5%–exactly the same as it was in June 2009. The U6 number includes discouraged workers who have not applied for a job in the past 30 days and those who have been involuntarily reduced to part-time status.</p>
<p>Housing: The latest edition of the Federal Reserve Beige Book reported that nearly all Federal Reserve Districts reported sluggish housing markets in the months since the homebuyer tax credit expired on April 30.<br />
Of these factors, consumer confidence and unemployment might be the most critical. Consumer spending accounts for two thirds of U.S. economic activity. So when consumers lose confidence and start hanging on tightly to their money, economic growth can halt. The same can be said when the jobless rate exceeds double-digit levels. Those people have less money to spend and it is hard for someone without meaningful employment to be optimistic about the future. A few months ago, some analysts were talking about a &#8220;jobless recovery.&#8221; In truth, it is difficult to understand how those two words could ever be accurately linked. There are not many times in our nation’s history when unemployment rates have been near or above 10%. And none of those occasions have been linked with economic prosperity. So it seems unlikely that this will be the exception.</p>
<p>Many of the glimmers of economic hope are fragile at best. There are improvements in corporate profits. But many of those gains are from restructuring and cuts rather than increased sales. Mortgage rates are at record lows. But it is difficult for many to qualify. Inflation remains low. But deflation is a possibility.</p>
<p>One of the biggest evidences cited as a sign of economic recovery is the 2009 market rally. But the advance has fizzled and most major stock indices are at about the same level as they were 11 months ago.</p>
<p>The chart below shows the New York Stock Exchange Composite.  It is negative for 2010 and has spent most of the past year within a few percentage points of its current level. The gold line is a 200-day simple moving average (MA). Notice that during the two most recent market rallies, the NYSE Composite came right to its 200-day MA and then retreated.</p>
<p><img id="image465" alt="072910.jpg" src="http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/072910.jpg" /></p>
<p>The middle portion of the chart is a moving average convergence divergence (MACD). While this indicator is currently positive and has not reached an overbought level, the MACD appears to be flattening, which could signal a change in market direction. The bottom portion of the chart is a stochastic oscillator, which is currently signaling that the NYSE is at an overbought level and confirms that a downturn could be on the near horizon.<br />
For investors, this combination of signs is certainly not predictive of what will occur. But the ongoing economic weakness combined with these technical market indicators certainly creates a case for continued caution.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/07/29/466/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Long-term view shows market still struggling</title>
		<link>http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/07/22/long-term-view-shows-market-still-struggling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/07/22/long-term-view-shows-market-still-struggling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dental Dollars Advisors</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Newsletter</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/07/22/long-term-view-shows-market-still-struggling/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke told members  of Congress that the economic outlook remains unusually uncertain.  Stock traders generally don’t like uncertainty, so the initial reaction  was predictably poor. But today (Thursday) the markets seem poised to  recoup Wednesday’s losses.
That is pretty much the way the market has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke told members  of Congress that the economic outlook remains unusually uncertain.  Stock traders generally don’t like uncertainty, so the initial reaction  was predictably poor. But today (Thursday) the markets seem poised to  recoup Wednesday’s losses.</p>
<p>That is pretty much the way the market has acted for the past three  months. Short-term moves in either direction are quickly reversed.  Economic announcements are met with volatility, but even the brightest  economists like Bernanke don’t seem to have any real idea of what to  expect in the future.</p>
<p>The second half of 2009 produced a powerful market rally and many  people assumed that the stock market and the economy would quickly erase  any evidence of a recession. That has not occurred.</p>
<p>As the chart below shows, even after the strong market advance in  2009, stocks making up the New York Stock Exchange Composite are still  significantly below their 2008 peak. I added the red line to the chart  to show that for the past year, stocks have stayed within a few  percentage points of their current level.</p>
<p><a title="072210.jpg" class="imagelink" href="http://www.marketowl.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/072210.jpg"><img alt="072210.jpg" id="image463" src="http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/072210.jpg" /><br />
</a></p>
<p>As long as the uncertainty described by Bernanke continues, there is a  good chance that stocks will continue to vacillate back and forth near  the current level. For that reason, the best course of action for most  investors is to maintain a conservative approach until the economic  outlook clears.<br />
<em>F.S.</em>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/07/22/long-term-view-shows-market-still-struggling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small businessess crucial to economic recovery</title>
		<link>http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/07/15/small-businessess-crucial-to-economic-recovery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/07/15/small-businessess-crucial-to-economic-recovery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dental Dollars Advisors</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Newsletter</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/07/15/small-businessess-crucial-to-economic-recovery/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 	 	 	 	 	The big companies get all of the media attention, but an economic recovery cannot occur unless small businesses are active participants. Small businesses have been hard hit by the economic downturn. And unlike huge corporations that have gotten assistance from the government, small businesses that need help are often left [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="CONTENT-TYPE" /> 	<title /> 	<meta content="OpenOffice.org 3.2  (Linux)" name="GENERATOR" /> 	<style type="text/css"> 	<!-- 		@page { margin: 0.79in } 		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } 	--> 	</style>The big companies get all of the media attention, but an economic recovery cannot occur unless small businesses are active participants. Small businesses have been hard hit by the economic downturn. And unlike huge corporations that have gotten assistance from the government, small businesses that need help are often left scrambling to find sources for financial support. That point was a central theme in a speech given this week by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke.</p>
<p>&#8220;Small businesses are central to creating jobs in our economy; they employ roughly one-half of all Americans and account for about 60 percent of gross job creation. Newer small businesses, those less than two years old, are especially important: Over the past 20 years, these start-up enterprises accounted for roughly one-quarter of gross job creation even though they employed less than 10 percent of the workforce.</p>
<p>Bernanke acknowledged that &#8220;to support the recovery, we need to find ways to ensure that credit-worthy borrowers have access to needed loans.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The formation and growth of small businesses depends critically on access to credit. Unfortunately, those businesses report that credit conditions remain very difficult. For example, the net percentage of survey respondents telling the National Federation of Independent Business that credit conditions have tightened over the prior three months has remained extremely elevated by historical standards. And one measure of banks’ loans to small businesses dropped from more than $710 billion in the second quarter of 2008 to less than $670 billion in the first quarter of 2010.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bernanke noted that since February, the Federal Reserve has conducted more than 40 meetings across the country &#8220;to exchange ideas about the challenges facing small businesses, both in the near term and in the longer run.&#8221;</p>
<p>This raises a couple of questions:</p>
<p>- Why has it taken so long for the government to realize the importance of small businesses?</p>
<p>- What is the Federal Reserve going to do about the restricted flow of credit going to small businesses?</p>
<p>The fact that these meetings are being conducted is a pretty good indication that while there is finally recognition of a problem, the Federal Reserve doesn’t currently have a plan for dealing with it.</p>
<p>&#8220;Business owners cited credit lines and working capital as their most critical financial needs, followed by refinancing products that would permit them to take advantage of low interest rates. Many reported having had to resort to borrowing through their personal credit cards or from their retirement accounts.&#8221;</p>
<p>Anyone concerned about the U.S. economy should find that statement particularly onerous. It essentially means that some business owners are being forced to mortgage their futures to stay in business today.</p>
<p>Small business owners who need cash flow to maintain their operations have few options when they cannot get a line of credit or a loan from a bank. For many the first source of available cash with a low interest rate is an equity line of credit on their personal home. If that is exhausted or unavailable, credit cards and retirement accounts might be the only remaining options. But the difference in interest rates between these choices can jump from about 5% to as much as 30%.</p>
<p>Here is another comment from Bernanke: &#8220;Some of the lenders that participated in our meetings expressed the view that current lending conditions don’t represent credit tightening as much as a return to more traditional underwriting standards following a period of too-lax standards. But, though some lenders said they were emphasizing cash flow and relying less on collateral values in evaluating creditworthiness, it seems clear that some credit-worthy businesses–including some whose collateral has lost value but whose cash flows remain strong–have had difficulty obtaining the credit that they need to expand, and in some cases, even to continue operating.&#8221;</p>
<p>Advisors at Strategis Financial Group have seen firsthand examples of situations almost exactly like he is describing. The result is that small businesses have been forced to cut back on staff, reduce operations, or even shut down, even though they have operated successfully for years and were current on financial obligations.</p>
<p>&#8220;Making credit accessible to sound small businesses is crucial to our economic recovery and so should be front and center among our current policy challenges.&#8221; It is good that Bernanke and the Federal Reserve are addressing and evaluating the critical role that small businesses play in our economy. Let us hope that this matter also comes to the attention of Congress and the Obama Administration and that steps are quickly taken to improve the situation for the nation’s small businesses.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/07/15/small-businessess-crucial-to-economic-recovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bonds gain as investors flee stocks</title>
		<link>http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/07/08/461/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/07/08/461/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dental Dollars Advisors</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Newsletter</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/07/08/461/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So far in 2010, stocks have struggled. Major indices began sliding in  April and most have significant losses since that time. As a result,  traders and investors looking for protection from risk and for gains  have been looking to long-term government bonds.
It’s no secret that U.S. Treasury Bonds have long been viewed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far in 2010, stocks have struggled. Major indices began sliding in  April and most have significant losses since that time. As a result,  traders and investors looking for protection from risk and for gains  have been looking to long-term government bonds.</p>
<p>It’s no secret that U.S. Treasury Bonds have long been viewed as a  secure investment. And during periods of weakness in the stock market,  investors and trader move money from stocks and into bonds. This pattern  is often referred to as a “flight to quality.”</p>
<p>With the exception of funds that short stock indices, long-term bond  funds are among the only positions returning positive gains so far in  2010.</p>
<p>The black line on the chart below shows iShares Barclays 20+ Year  Treasury Bond Fund (TLT). The gold line is the S&#038;P 500, included for  comparison.</p>
<p><img id="image460" alt="070710-tlt.jpg" src="http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/070710-tlt.jpg" /></p>
<p>As the chart clearly shows, so far in 2010 long-term bonds have shown  a high inverse correlation to the stock market.</p>
<p>The bottom portion of the chart is a relative strength indicator  (RSI). When this indicator trends above 50, the underlying investment  has the strength and momentum to sustain an upward trend. In the case of  TLT, it has held above that mark since mid-April.</p>
<p>Strategis Financial Group is currently holding bond positions in  several of its investment strategies.</p>
<p>As long as stocks continue to struggle it is likely that the value of  long-term bonds will keep rising.<br />
<em>F.S.</em>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/07/08/461/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quarter marked by volatility and weakness</title>
		<link>http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/07/01/459/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/07/01/459/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dental Dollars Advisors</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Newsletter</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/07/01/459/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The second quarter of 2010 ended with major market indices losing  anywhere from 9% to 11%. Over the past three months, the list of  economic notables who warned that the economy still faces serious  threats included current Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and past  Chairman Alan Greenspan.
High unemployment and weak housing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second quarter of 2010 ended with major market indices losing  anywhere from 9% to 11%. Over the past three months, the list of  economic notables who warned that the economy still faces serious  threats included current Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and past  Chairman Alan Greenspan.</p>
<p>High unemployment and weak housing sales are two of the major  contributing factors that continue holding back the economy. Tuesday a  disappointing consumer confidence report sent major indices falling as  much as 3% with additional losses Wednesday.</p>
<p>The selling this week finally pushed most major indices below strong  technical support—typically a very bearish sign. Summer months are often  seasonally weak for equity markets, and this summer is following that  pattern.</p>
<p>The chart below shows the Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility  Index (VIX), a popular measure of the implied volatility of S&#038;P 500  index options. Over the past five years, the only time the VIX has been  at a higher level is during the market plunge that began in October  2008.</p>
<p>The VIX is commonly called the “fear index” because it is a  reflection of expected market volatility for the next 30 days. In other  words, it is a good indicator of potential market risk. And right now it  is signaling that risk is high.</p>
<p><img id="image457" alt="1.jpg" src="http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/1.jpg" /></p>
<p>The next chart shows performance of the New York Stock Exchange  Composite over the past year. A little over a week ago, this index along  with most others had rebounded nicely. The picture has since had a  dramatic reversal. The blue line shows that this week this index broke  below a key support level.</p>
<p><a class="imagelink" title="063010-nyse.jpg" href="http://www.marketowl.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/063010-nyse.jpg"><img id="image458" alt="2.jpg" src="http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/2.jpg" /><br />
</a></p>
<p>The gold line is a 200-day simple moving average. The fact that the  NYSE Composite is now moving away from this line instead of towards it  is a good indication that additional market declines could be on the  near horizon.</p>
<p>The bottom portion of the chart is a relative strength index (RSI).  This indicator measures market momentum. Right now the RSI is trending  below 50, which means that stocks probably do not have enough momentum  to sustain an advance and as a result, market risk is elevated.</p>
<p>For investors, all of this means that this is not a good time to be  invested in equities because of the elevated risk level and the  potential for additional market declines.<br />
<em>F.S.</em>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/07/01/459/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diversification hard to achieve</title>
		<link>http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/06/24/diversification-hard-to-achieve/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/06/24/diversification-hard-to-achieve/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 19:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dental Dollars Advisors</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Newsletter</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/06/24/diversification-hard-to-achieve/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 	 	 	 	 	The concept of portfolio diversification as a means to minimize risk for individual investors gained attention in the 1950s and 1960s. According to Wikipedia, &#8220;Diversification in finance means reducing risk by investing in a variety of assets. If the asset values do not move up and down in perfect synchrony, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="CONTENT-TYPE" /> 	<title /> 	<meta content="OpenOffice.org 3.2  (Linux)" name="GENERATOR" /> 	<style type="text/css"> 	<!-- 		@page { margin: 0.79in } 		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } 	--> 	</style>The concept of portfolio diversification as a means to minimize risk for individual investors gained attention in the 1950s and 1960s. According to Wikipedia, &#8220;Diversification in finance means reducing risk by investing in a variety of assets. If the asset values do not move up and down in perfect synchrony, a diversified portfolio will have less risk than the weighted average risk of its constituent assets …&#8221;</p>
<p>Diversification is actually a common risk management technique that applies to more than investing. About the time of the Revolutionary War, someone figured out that if forces were diversified across the terrain instead of bunched together in a group, survival rates increased—especially when confronting a superior foe.</p>
<p>When the concept caught hold on Wall Street, diversification was appealing for another reason. At the time, trading stocks presented ordinary investors with several challenges. There was no Internet or discount brokerages. Trades were generally executed through full service brokerage firms. Brokerage fees and commissions were hefty and frequent trading could quickly erase an investor’s gains. So traders and investors were eager to embrace a practice that lessened trading expenses while also lowering portfolio risk.</p>
<p>Again quoting Wikipedia, &#8220;by the end of the 1960s, there were approximately 270 [mutual] funds.&#8221; Compare that to the thousands of mutual funds that exist today. Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) did not exist. In short, investors of that era had far fewer investment options that we do now.</p>
<p>The investing world has seen dramatic changes since the concept of diversification was first proposed. While the idea is still valid, many investors and professional money managers fail to understand the difficulty of achieving real portfolio diversification.</p>
<p>There is a misconception that investors can significantly reduce their portfolio risk by dividing their assets among different asset categories, such as large cap stocks, small cap stocks, international stocks, value stocks, market sectors and bonds. The misconception is that because these assets are varied, they will not move in concert. Unfortunately, while their movements might not be completely in sync, that does not mean they are uncorrelated enough to offer significant diversification.</p>
<p>This point is easy to see with a simple price chart. On the chart below I have included five ETFs and one index representing six different asset categories. As the chart clearly shows, over the past two years five of the six asset classes have shown a high level of correlation. The only investment that showed significant variation was U.S. government bonds (TLT). And bonds benefited from a flight to quality in 2008 as the equity markets plunged.</p>
<p><img alt="062410.jpg" id="image455" src="http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/062410.jpg" /></p>
<p><a name="image476" /></p>
<p>What this means is that an investor who purchased these six different investment alternatives in equal portions would actually have had very little diversification or protection from market risk over the two-year period represented by this chart.</p>
<p>Changes in the financial industry might contribute to today’s synchronization of the equity markets. Investors and traders have more access to information today than ever before. Just 15 years ago it was difficult for ordinary investors to know what a given stock was doing during the day. Today anyone with a connection to the Internet can follow the markets minute by minute. Online trades occur almost instantly.</p>
<p>Even international positions do not provide the diversification they once did. Shares of many companies are traded on exchanges of several countries. Globalization means that a Dutch-owned company that does lots of business in the Far East might trade heavily on any given day on U.S. stock exchanges.</p>
<p>After the market decline of 2000-2002, some investors sought risk protection and diversification by purchasing real estate. That decision also turned out poorly for many when real estate faltered in 2008.</p>
<p>In spite of the high correlation among stock market asset classes, many advisors still tell clients that diversification models designed in the 1950s and 1960s offer protection against market risk. One such company in our area has a flashing billboard that encourages people to ask about its Nobel Prize winning investment strategy. I suspect they neglect to tell people that the strategy was devised in the 1950s. It’s similar to a phone store putting up a sign that says &#8220;ask us about our rotary dial, corded telephones.&#8221;</p>
<p>What many advisors overlook is that there are a wide range of investment products available today that did not exist 50 years ago. These include products that offer real diversification and provide true protection against market risk. In general, they cannot be mentioned here unless I am willing to add some lengthy legal disclosures.</p>
<p>But be aware that if your advisor tells you that asset class diversification is the answer to protecting your investment portfolio against market risk, you might want to talk to someone else.</p>
<p>F.S.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dentaldollars.net/newsletter/2010/06/24/diversification-hard-to-achieve/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
